Got this from "The American Thinker",
Using borrowed money for a band-aid bailout of the economy should seem backwards to most people. However, it likely is a planned strategy to promote radical change. Those naively believing that President Obama is simply rewarding his far-left base, and will then move to the political center, must wise up.
The assumption that Obama will need the nation to prosper in
order to protect the 2010 mid-term election incorrectly assumes that he esteems
free market capitalism. He does not. Rather than win through superior ideas and
policies, the Democrat plan for success in the mid-term elections is to win by
destroying political opposition.
Obama adheres to the Saul Alinksy Rules
for Radicals method of politics, which teaches the dark art of destroying political
adversaries. However, that text reveals only one front in the radical
left's war against America. The Cloward/Piven Strategy is another method employed by the
radical Left to create and manage crisis. This strategy explains Rahm
Emanuel's ominous statement, "You never want a serious crisis to go to
waste."
The Cloward/Piven Strategy is named after Columbia University
sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. Their goal is to overthrow
capitalism by overwhelming the government bureaucracy with entitlement demands.
The created crisis provides the impetus to bring about radical political
change.
Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation... [Emphasis added.]
Making an already weak economy even worse is the intent of the
Cloward/Piven Strategy. It is imperative that we view the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Plan's spending on items like food stamps, jobless
benefits,
and health care through this end goal. This
strategy explains why the Democrat plan to "stimulate" the economy involves
massive deficit spending projects. It includes billions for ACORN and its
subgroups such as SHOP and the Neighborhood Stabilization
Program.
Expanding the S-Chip Program through deficit spending in a
supposed effort to "save the children" only makes a faltering economy worse.
If Congress were to allow a robust economy, parents would be
able to provide for their children themselves by earning and keeping more of
their own money. Democrats, quick to not waste a crisis, would consider that a
lost opportunity.
The Cato Institute reports that the plan will harm a faltering economy, intentionally
causing increased job losses leading to increased demands for the aforementioned
programs. Even the jobs to be created are set apart to render social justice,
not economic revival. Robert Reich believes new infrastructure jobs
should not go to white construction workers. Meanwhile,
workers at Microsoft, IBM, Texas Instruments, and the retail market find
themselves experiencing the life of the welfare poor.
If highly educated and trained workers continue
to lose jobs and business
falters as a whole, where will these jobless workers go? Could this be construed
as revolutionary social reorganization that puts the underachiever above the
achiever? Where is the future economic strength when jobless professionals
collect welfare and unemployment while dreaming of a minimum wage job? For
whites, there's not even the hope of a good paying construction job.
Because these programs are financed with deficit
spending, the effect of the Cloward/Piven Strategy becomes doubly destructive.
Talk about a perfect storm! The Democrat stimulus plan is a mechanism whose goal
is the destruction of the traditional American way of life. It is bitter irony
that the American taxpayer will actually fund the destruction of his own ability
to live according to the values of our Founding Documents. It is not alarmist to
identify this situation as a coup
d'etat.
As the flow of money from the top of the economy dries up, job
losses and mortgage
busts will mount exponentially. The Democrat stimulus plan provides for welfare
expansion but not for a robust economy that creates high paying jobs. Is this
what Obama means when he warns, "It's going to get worse before
it gets better?" If we are not bailing out corporate America so they can
regain profitability, we must conclude Obama is working
toward another end goal. Recognizing these attack methods reveals the only
logical response -- an unwavering wall of "No!"
By Nancy Coppock
No comments:
Post a Comment